Short Article: How Much UFOlogy Fit With Science?

If you are a little interested in UFOs and Extraterrestrials, then perhaps, you have looked around some popular blogs and sites like UFOMystic run by Nick Redfern, Greg Bishop and some other co-bloggers. But here is a question how reliable and logical, is our Ufology from scientific perspective? Paranormal and ufo investigators use to define such phenomenon(here I’m assuming Ufo as a paranormal phenomenon) with words like hyperspace or interdimensional entities and wormhole propulsion and some other theoretically correct scientific words. But should they? For example, if you have witnessed ghost, it would generally be explained as some sort of interdimensional being or possibly a plasma being, no matter what it is. Below is a video said to be of bizarre alien species. Watch it!

The video states that the alien being could be from higher dimensions. Well, I would like tell UFOlogists that a hyperdimensional entity would never be perceptible to us. Here are some bad words used by paranormal investigators and ufologists:
1.Interdimensional being: well, concept of multiuniverse was presented as solution to Schroedinger’s hypothetical cat paradox. Later devised by Kaluja-Klein and he gave a theoretical possibility of tiny wrapped dimensions. Nothing much than that. Such thing hasn’t been observed(practically evident) yet, it is one of the most favourite term of ufologists.
2. Antigravity: anti gravity is an umbrella term to describe method of propulsion of UFOs. Purely theoretical. Hasn’t been tested yet.
3. Wormhole: wormholes are used to comprehend the origin of Ufos. No evidences and illusively existent in universe.
4. Future Beings: It also comes as one of the explanation of ufos. It’s suggested that time traveller from future, are visiting us. Time travel has been allowed in theory and is very contradictionery.
5. Plasma Entities: Plasma physicist David Bohm observed some nice and sophisticated patterns in plasma. He found that a cluster of particles was behaving as well organized cell. This experiment proposed that plasma life forms could be very well possible. Although no plasma being has been captured. We haven’t even technology to capture plasma.
Now it is clear that ufologists are trying to explain such ufo phenomenon with the theory which hasn’t been observed and tested yet. Theory says, doesn’t mean it should be existent. I can name you hundred terms used by ufologists, which are either non existent or like to live in theory. I think ufologists should try to mess up with some new plausible explanation or leave it alone on its own fate. We have no theory of everything so don’t try to use such terms since they are surely illusive until we have experimental evidences.

Zeta Reticuli And Aliens

by Joe LeSearne

Since the 6th of October, 1995, several new planets orbiting other suns have been discovered and officially announced.  However, in what may be a breakthrough for ufology, on the 20th of September, 1996, a planet was discovered orbiting the star Zeta 2 Reticuli.

In 1961, Betty and Barney Hill were abducted by aliens and taken aboard their spacecraft.  During her abduction, Betty was shown a star map.  She was asked by an alien to point out the Earth, but since Betty had no knowledge of astronomy, she couldn’t reply.  After her abduction, and under hypnotic regression Betty Hill drew the star map as accurately as possible.  A few years later, Marjorie Fish built a few models of star systems using plastic balls and wire .. one of these models matched Betty Hill’s diagram.  The star system from which Betty had been told the aliens originated from was Zeta 2 Reticuli!

The Betty Hill Star Map as Interpreted by Ms. Marjorie Fish:

The Betty Hill Star Map

Reference:  The Zeta Reticuli Incident by Terence Dickinson
This highly recommended publication is available in hard copy from Stanton Friedman at

http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/sfpage.html

In 1988, Bob Lazar came forward with an incredible story.  Bob Lazar claimed he had worked at Area 51 (S4) in Nevada to reverse engineer alien spacecraft that had been captured by the US Government.  During his stay at S4 he was given briefing papers to read and some of them described the alien’s home solar system .. and yes, you’ve guessed it … Zeta 2 Reticuli, and specifically the 4th planet in that solar system!

I have provided some interesting information below I found on several mailing lists:

From the Extra Solar Planets Encylopedia:
Star Name Distance
(Parsecs)
Spectral
Class
Visual
Magnitude
M[.sini]
Jupiter mass: (J)
Earth  mass: (E)
Semi-Major         Axis
(AU)
Period
years (y)
days (d)
Eccentricity Inclination
(degrees)
Radius
(Earth
Radius)
Zeta 2 Reticuli 11 pc G1V 5.24 0.27(J) 0.14 AU 18.9 d 0

In a rather strange “about face,” the above information was removed from the Extra Solar Planets Encyclopedia site after 4 days.  The official reason for removal was that“the data may have been misinterpreted and there probably is no planet.”

Now this big quarter of a Jupiter mass planet is in an orbit about Zeta 2 Reticuli which lasts 18.9 days and has a Semi-Major Axis of 0.14 Astronomical Unit (AU).  For comparison Mercury has a Semi-Major Axis of 0.387 AU equal to 36 million miles and Earth has a Semi-Major Axis of 1.00 AU equal to 92.9 million miles.  Now if we assume that this newly discovered planet, which we will name Reticulum 1 in accordance with Bob Lazar’s convention, is the closest one to Zeta 2 Reticuli (it’s hard to imagine a closer one), then following Bode’s Law (the law which states each planet is about twice the distance from it’s sun as its inner neighbor) Reticulum 2 should be at 0.28 AU, Reticulum 3 should be at 0.56 AU and, INTERESTINGLY, Reticulum 4 would be at 1.12 AU in between the Earth’s 1.00 AU and Mars’s 1.52 AU, well within the “life-zone” of a G class star!

I just found another possible way that this recent discovery could confirm part of Lazar and Jarod 2’s story.  I found the length of the Zeta 2 Reticulum 4’s year.  How did I do this you might ask?  Simple, with calculator in hand I used two elementary laws of Astronomy.  Bode’s Law and Kepler’s 3rd Law.

The numbers I used were from that data on the Extrasolar Planets Encyclopedia Website are these:

  • The Semi-Major Axis of a planetary orbit is measured in Astronomical Units (AU).
  • The Period of an orbit is measured in Earth days or years.  The newly discovered planet has a Semi-Major Axis of 0.14 AU and a Period of 18.9 days.
  • Some Definitions:
    1. 1 Astronomical Unit (AU)  =  92.9 million miles  =  the distance between the Earth and Sun.
    2. The “Semi-Major Axis” is the measurement of the planets orbit, an ellipse, in relation to it’s star in Astronomical Units.  The Earth’s Semi-Major axis is 1.00 AU.  The “Semi-Major Axis” of a perfectly circular orbit would be the radius of that orbit.
    3. The “Period” is the amount of time it takes to complete one orbit.  A planet’s period is it’s year.  The Earth’s Period is 365.25 days.

First, Bode’s Law:

As I stated before if you apply Bode’s law which states:  The semi-major axis of each planet is double that of it’s neighbor nearer to the star.  Or simply each planet is about twice as far from its star as its inner neighbor (i.e. Jupiter is 5.2 AU from the Sun, Saturn is 9.5 AU).  Now if you apply this to the new discovery of a planet around Zeta 2 Reticuli and you assume this planet is the closest to its star this making it the closest planet to Zeta Reticuli 2 (Reticulum 1 we will call it in keeping with Lazar’s naming convention, which, I should add differs from the IAU convention which would name it Zeta 2 Reticulum A – so far).  At 0.14 AU it’s hard to imagine a closer planet to Zeta 2 Reticuli.  For comparison, Mercury is located at 0.387 AU from the Sun so this newly found planet is Reticulum 1 in all likelyhood.  Using Bodes law we can extrapolate where the other planets of Zeta 2 Reticuli should be.

Kepler’s 3rd law relates the planet’s period or year to it’s Semi-Major Axis of it’s orbit.  Mathematically this is expressed as P2 = a3.  “P” is the Period measured in earth years and “a” is the Semi-Major Axis measued in Astronomical units (AU).  Using both of these we can find out the length of the year on each hypothetical planet in the Zeta 2 Reticuli system, INCLUDING Reticulum 4, Bob Lazar’s home of the Greys.

Now let’s apply Bodes Law and Kepler’s 3rd Law:

Planets of the Zeta 2 Reticuli System
Planet Semi-Major Axis Period
In Days
Period
In Years
Reticulum 1 0.14 AU 18.9 days 0.052 years
Reticulum 2 0.28 AU 54.0 days 0.1481 years
Reticulum 3 0.56 AU 152.9 days 0.4196 years
Reticulum 4 1.12 AU 432.6 days 1.12 years

So one Reticulum 4 year is equal to roughly 1.12 earth years OR 432 days.  And Reticulum 4 is in roughly the same position in Zeta 2 Reticuli’s “life-zone” as the Earth is in the Sun’s “life-zone.”  Zeta 2 Retituli is a G1V spectral class star, the Sun is a G2V.  They are both “G” class main sequence stars, the difference between the “2” and the “1” indicates that Zeta 2 Reticuli is a little hotter than the Sun.  The higher the middle number the lower the temperature.  The “V” means they are both main sequence (middle age) stars but given Zeta 2 Reticuli’s higher temperature, and lower metallicity, it is probably older than the Sun by a couple billion years.  So basically the Sun is a little cooler and younger than Zeta 2 Reticuli.

For comparison here is a breakdown of the inner planets of our own solar system.

Inner Planets of Our Solar System
Planet Semi-Major Axis Period
In Days
Period
In Years
Mercury 0.387 AU 87.97 days 0.2409 years
Venus 0.723 AU 224.7 days 0.6152 years
Earth 1.000 AU 365.25 days 1.0000 years
Mars 1.524 AU 686.98 days 1.8809 years

So this brings me to my conclusion.  We can check part of Lazar and Jarod 2’s story by asking the simple question:  “How long is a year on Reticulum 4?”  If the answer is anywhere in the neighborhood of 410 to 445 days (I’m allowing a lot for error), then their stock will have gone up even more.  Keep me posted as to what you find out.{ref}

Why UFO Encounters Are More Than Ever?

Since the first and famed incident of Rosswell occured in which UFO was crashed near Mexico(although many proclaimed the accident actually happened at two different places), we have encountered a lot of UFO sighting and so called crop circles as well. Why we are continuously observing such extra terrestrial activities or is it from our own planet? These are some questions which often springs back mind. I had speculated life forms and interpreted how diverse that could be. Even counter intuitive element could support life. I’m not going to talk much about that right now. But here I will tell you another reason for rich UFO sightings. I’m not going to abdicate any way. This may seem you foolish. Since the Rosswell incident our population has just has increased to double. Population growth does seem amanuensis to explain increased UFO encounters. We know UFO or aliens like to appear in remote places but population growth has filled those places specially in the case of US and Mexico this case seems true.

Update: Why Has There been No Contact with Aliens?

I’ve talked about many possible and plausible aspects about how alien life could be, their behaviour and nature and one more thing if they are really existent, where are they? Why haven’t they contacted us? Many idea which I actually imitate are here . Though I tried to consider every scenario but perhaps, I missed one. Contact with aliens also depends upon searching tactics and parameters of aliens along with others. It has already been proposed that aliens may be of different forms with entirely different biochemisty. We know universe is filled with possibility. That’s why we can’t ignore the possibility of aliens being from a flaming environment of acids or freezy atmosphere of saturn like planet. Might they be silicon based or even ammonia or anything completely unknown to us. If they are advanced and have curiousity to know about universe it is expected by nature they would explore planets similar to their own home and they direct their message to planets similar to home planet. If there are really intelligent civilization , possibly we never receive their message cause they are different. Unless we go to saturn or titan or europa and set there a SETI program, then we could have hope. So there are more chances if we get acquainted to alien civilization, it would be more human like but advanced. Really important case scenario! Whatever else we could get in future , who knows?
[Credit: Mark Louis, a regular reader of this blog]

Ways To Contact Avatars….

Interstellar Spaceflight How can our civilization search for extraterrestrial life? By what means can we attempt to make this evolutionary leap forward? One obvious way is to develop the capability to travel far outside our Solar System. By involving many nations in the space programs begun by the United States and the Soviet Union, our civilization might be expected eventually to develop the means to travel through interstellar space. However, such technology will not be achieved easily; it may not even be a practical possibility.

A basic problem with interstellar space travel is the quantity of fuel needed for long-duration flights. The damaging effects of galactic radiation is another issue, as are the loneliness and boredom of generations of humans having to spend their entire lives aboard a spacecraft. Consider, for example, a trip to the nearest star system beyond our Solar System, namely Alpha Centauri ~4.3 light-years away. With a constant flight velocity of 50 km/s, which approximates the speed of our fastest robotic space probes, this trip would take ~25,000 years. That’s a fast enough velocity to escape the Solar System, yet 250 centuries would still be needed to reach the closest star system. Contrast this duration with, for instance, the 15 centuries since the fall of the Roman Empire or the 50 centuries since the construction of the Pyramids. Even if fuel for the spacecraft and food for the inhabitants were available, such a flight would take an incredibly long time by human standards.

This example assumes a spacecraft traveling at a velocity much less than the velocity of light. In fact, 50 km/s equals less than 0.02% of light velocity. We might imagine that our civilization could someday become smart enough to achieve flight velocities close to 100% of light velocity, which might dramatically reduce travel times by means of special relativistic effects—but we would probably be fooling ourselves.

Relativistic space flight seems nice in theory, for flight durations could seemingly be diminished, as has been suggested by legions of science-fiction writers. But in practice, there’s a problem. Spacecraft traveling at speeds close to light velocity cannot be easily refueled. A reasonably sized craft of, for example, 104 kg (10 tons) would need more than a billion kilograms (a million tons) of hydrogen fuel just to accelerate it to 10% of light velocity. These numbers assume that such a spacecraft derives its energy from a hydrogen-helium fusion reaction; the helium squirts out the rear and the spacecraft lurches forward via Newton’s third law. However, to reach relativistic speeds, namely >90% of light velocity, would require so much on-board fuel as to make this proposition ridiculous.

The idea of using interstellar hydrogen gas as a spacecraft moves through space seems equally futile. To accelerate to 10% of light velocity would require a gigantic scoop kilometers across. Such a scoop need not be made of physical material; rather, it could be a huge electromagnetic field, capable of harvesting charged protons needed for fuel. Yet to reach relativistic speeds would require such a scoop to be of light-year dimensions. And furthermore, according to the proven rules of relativity, the spacecraft’s mass would increase relative to the interstellar medium from which it captured its fuel, which would require even more fuel and so on, making this a self-defeating proposition. Given the laws of physics as we currently know them, relativistic space flight seems destined to remain science fiction. Probably no intelligent civilization would or could do it.

These arguments don’t necessarily prohibit traveling through interstellar space at much slower speeds. If our descendants can overcome harmful radiation and severe boredom during long, long journeys, interstellar travel might someday become feasible with modest fuel supplies and speeds of a few percent of light velocity. To do so, however, would mean not just generations of space travel, but flights lasting thousands and perhaps even millions of years.

Equally possible, these practical problems might never be solved, or perhaps our civilization will not survive long enough even to attempt interstellar space flight. Future generations of Earthlings might well conclude that it’s simply impractical to travel over large galactic distances. If so, we will be forever confined to our Solar System and at best a handful of nearby stars.

Accordingly, it seems unlikely that human space flight is a useful means to seek contact with extraterrestrials. Even with the most optimistic estimates of the many factors in the Drake equation, galactic civilizations (if they exist at all) are probably spread out like small islands within the vast sea of galactic space. For example, with all the interior factors of our equation maximized and the average technological lifetime equal to 1000 years, we might conclude that 1000 advanced civilizations currently reside in our Galaxy. Given the size and shape of the Milky Way, ~3000 light-years would then separate any two adjacent civilizations. Such large distances force the word “neighboring” to take on new meaning.

Even if the average lifetime of galactic civilizations is 1 million years, our most optimistic estimates suggest that each is separated by ~300 light-years. To have a reasonable hope of successful contact, hundreds, perhaps thousands, of sorties would need to be launched toward candidate star systems. All in all, interstellar space flight is both impractical and uneconomical either at the present time or in the foreseeable future. It may never become feasible.

Interstellar Probes Other methods might be used to search for extraterrestrial intelligence in the Galaxy. Imagine, for example, launching many robot space probes, each with a velocity sufficient to escape our Solar System. Each probe would eventually reach a star system judged a good candidate for intelligent life, where it would orbit the star, looking and listening for evidence of life on one of the planets. Such a probe could be programmed to detect the leakage of electromagnetic radiation arising from the daily activities of a technological civilization. It might succeed immediately upon arriving, should an advanced civilization already be thriving. Or a probe might need to bug an alien star system for thousands of years before seeing or hearing any type of planetary activity resembling our radio, television, military radar, or whatever. Once the robots did detect any sign of intelligence, they would send a radio signal back to Earth, letting us know that a technological civilization has emerged.

Robot probes offer a couple of advantages in the search for extraterrestrials: They would be neither bored by the long duration of the flight, nor harmed by the harsh radiation of interstellar space. But a disadvantage with this method of contact is that, once again, it would seem uneconomical for the foreseeable future. To bug all single F-, G-, and K-type stars within 1000 light-years of Earth would require about a million probes. Given the number of days in a year, one probe would need to be launched every day for nearly 3000 years. Aside from these formidable logistics problems, the cost of such a program would be staggering.

In a sense, our civilization has already launched several such probes, although they lack the sophistication of the robots just noted. Figure is a reproduction of a plaque mounted aboard the American Pioneer 10 spacecraft launched in the mid-1970s. Similar information was also included aboard the American Voyager spacecraft launched a few years later. After visiting the outer planets, these probes are now on their way out of the Solar System, but they have no specific destination thereafter.

_

— This is a replica of a plaque mounted onboard the Pioneer 10 spacecraft. Key features of the plaque include: a scale drawing of the spacecraft itself, as well as a man and a woman (right center); a schematic diagram of a hydrogen atom undergoing a change in energy (top left); a starburst pattern representing various pulsars and the frequencies of their radio waves usable to estimate when the craft was launched (middle left); and a depiction of the Solar System, showing that the spacecraft left the third planet from the Sun and passed the fifth planet on its way into outer space (bottom). All the drawings have computer (binary) coded markings from which actual sizes, distances, and times can be derived. (Carl Sagan)

Even if these American spacecraft do accidentally encounter an alien star system housing an advanced civilization, these machines are incapable of reporting that news back to Earth. Should a civilization on the other end intercept the probe, they should be able to unravel most of its contents using the universal language of “mathematiceese.” The caption to Figure notes how aliens might interpret from where and when the Pioneer and Voyager probes were originally launched. They would then know that we are here (or were when the probes were sent), although we would remain unaware of their existence. Perhaps not such a good thing.

So methods that rely on space travel, either crewed or uncrewed, don’t seem to hold much promise in contacting extraterrestrial intelligent life. One can always argue that future technological breakthroughs may someday make such projects more favorable. Indeed, the microelectronic revolution now under way might eventually make unmanned probes more feasible. But given what we know now, long-distance space travel seems logistically and economically unlikely.

Aside from these practical problems, some scientists argue that it’s not a smart idea to signal extraterrestrials actively. As noted earlier in this FUTURE EPOCH, our recent emergence as a technologically competent civilization implies that we’re now among the dumbest technological intelligences in the Galaxy. Any other civilization either that we discover, or that discovers us, will almost surely be more advanced than us. Consequently, a healthy degree of skepticism is warranted. After all, if you were lost in a jungle populated by unknown natives, you would be wise not to yell, scream, or send up smoke signals to let them know of your presence. It’s a lot safer to explore your environment quietly for a while, to listen to the sound of the drums, and to get a feeling for their intentions.

Some anthropologists have even speculated about the behavior of advanced galactic civilizations. If extraterrestrials behave even remotely like human civilizations on Earth, then the most advanced aliens might naturally try to dominate all others. Indeed, the “smarter” species have often taken advantage of others throughout the history of life on Earth. Even so, the aggressiveness of Earthlings may not in any way apply to extraterrestrials. And in any case, the vast distances separating galactic civilizations would probably prohibit a civilization on one planet from physically dominating or enslaving a less advanced civilization on some other planet. In fact, physical contact among different cosmic civilizations may not be biologically desirable; what is healthy for one life form might be a disease to another.

Radio Communication A third technique is much cheaper than either of the two methods noted above and has many advantages. This method is designed to make contact with extraterrestrials using only electromagnetic radiation, in particular it doesn’t utilize any kind of hardware traveling through space. The technique is economically feasible, can be undertaken with existing equipment, and doesn’t reveal our presence should some extraterrestrials be hostile.

This third method uses radiation as the fastest known means of transferring information from one place to another. Since light and other types of high-frequency radiation are heavily scattered while moving through dusty interstellar space, long-wavelength radio radiation seems the best way to transfer information in the plane of the Galaxy where civilizations are likely to be located. Accordingly, radio telescopes on Earth would be used to listen passively for radio signals emitted by someone else. No radiation would be transmitted by our civilization toward distant star systems. Best of all, we have already invented the equipment needed to detect such alien radio signals. Some preliminary searches are now underway, thus far without success.

Radio searches of this type are not without problems, however. The foremost problem is that this method assumes that extraterrestrials are in fact broadcasting radio signals for one reason or another. If they aren’t, this search technique will fail. Another problem concerns the need to distinguish radio signals artificially generated by advanced civilizations from signals naturally emitted by interstellar gas clouds; interference of all kinds could be a major impediment. Other problems include the direction in which to aim our radio telescopes, the frequency at which to tune our receivers, and time of day when to listen.

Such a search could be undertaken by following either of two strategies. One strategy attempts to eavesdrop on the radio radiation normally leaking from some planet while its civilization goes about its daily business. A sample of what might be expected can be gained by reversing the problem and examining the appearance of Earth from afar. Figure  shows the pattern of radio signals unintentionally leaked into space by our civilization. From the viewpoint of some distant observer, the spinning Earth emits a bright flash of radio radiation every few hours. The flashes result from the periodic rising and setting of hundreds of radio stations and television transmitters. Because the great majority of these transmitters are clustered in eastern United States and western Europe, and because they emit their radiation parallel to the ground where people live, a distant observer would detect blasts of radiation leaking from Earth as our planet rotates each day. This radiation races out into space as a growing sphere of radio, television, and other electromagnetic signals (such as radar). It’s been doing so since the invention of these technologies several decades ago. In fact, Earth is now a more intense radio source than the Sun—thanks to our technological civilization.

_ FIGURE — Radio radiation now leaks from Earth into space because of the daily activities of our technological civilization. (a) FM radio and non-cable television transmitters broadcast their energy parallel to Earth’s surface, so they send a great “sheet” of electromagnetic radiation into interstellar space, producing the strongest signal in any given direction when they happen to lie on Earth’s horizon. (b) Because the great majority of transmitters are clustered in the eastern United States and western Europe, a distant observer would detect blasts of radiation from Earth as our planet rotates each day. (Prentice Hall)

If any advanced civilizations reside within ~50 light-years of Earth, we have already broadcast our presence to them. Whether or not the extraterrestrials have received the message, we don’t yet know. But if they have, they might well have concluded that we aren’t so intelligent, given the content of our radio and television programs.

This eavesdropping strategy resembles the space probe technique discussed earlier, although here the “bugging” of other planetary systems can be accomplished from Earth using large radio telescopes. However, such telescopes now in operation are likely sensitive enough to eavesdrop on only a few of the nearest star systems. Remember, the strength of radiation decreases with the square of the distance.

We do currently have the engineering ability to build a huge detector that could intercept the hodgepodge of radio, radar, and television signals wastefully leaked into space by other, distant civilizations—namely, ones like our own. Figure 8.30 shows the major features of a gigantic array of radio telescopes capable of eavesdropping on Earth-like civilizations within ~1000 light-years of us. Called Project Cyclops, this vast machine hasn’t yet been built—and it may never be since the price tag for such a device is ~$20 billion (1995 dollars). Its construction is currently improbable, given all the social, bureaucratic, and militaristic demands for taxpayers’ money. Keep in mind, though, that this cost is roughly equivalent to the price tag of one American aircraft carrier or a fleet of Russian warheads. It’s simply a matter of where our society wants to place its priorities.

_ FIGURE — This is a design sketch of a gigantic array of 1000 interconnected radio telescopes, called Project Cyclops. Such a device could be used to eavesdrop on civilizations much like our own, provided they are within ~1000 light-years of Earth. (NASA)

Another radio-based strategy might be used to search effectively for extraterrestrial intelligent life. However, this one relies on a single, key assumption, the validity of which is totally unknown. The assumption is that at least one advanced civilization is beaming strong radio signals toward many star systems in the Galaxy—our Sun among them—actively hoping to contact us. Such a radio beacon, set up by an alien broadcaster specifically to attract our attention, might be detectable with radio telescopes already built on Earth. But there’s a catch here too, as other concerns hinder this passive, optimistic search strategy. To give but one example, in what direction should we listen? Even if we limit our targets to Sun-like stars, ~500 of them exist within only ~300 light-years of Earth. Any one of them could have a planetary civilization that is transmitting toward us. To be thorough, we would need to sample every such star system.

The basic issue in estimating the number of extraterrestrial civilizations we could contact isn’t the extent to which a society develops technology. Rather, the real issue is the degree to which a society generates curiosity and maintains it for long periods of time. A two-way interstellar dialogue requires, not only technological competence, but also sufficient motivation on both ends—ours and theirs. How motivated is a society to communicate with other societies beyond its own home planet? How universal is curiosity? How persistent is it? Would the residents of every inhabited planet have a deep desire to know if others exist in the Universe.

Humans on Earth do seem to have a genuine curiosity about the Universe. Since consciousness dawned, many humans have wondered about who they are and where they came from. Many have also thought about extraterrestrial life beyond Earth. But how long does this curiosity last? Does technologically competent intelligent life remain curious indefinitely?

Curiosity may wax and wane over the ages, as it has on our planet. The Greeks and Romans were curious, the barbarians of the Middle Ages apparently less so; now in post-Renaissance times, we are again highly curious people. Perhaps other advanced civilizations reside in the depths of space, but their societies have reached the stage of mental and physical stagnation broached earlier in this FUTURE EPOCH. Maybe their curiosity is gone forever. Again, we repeat our earlier query: If curiosity dies, does intelligence die also?

Distressingly, if the average technological lifetime is only 1000 years, then, as noted above, the average distance separating galactic civilizations would be ~3000 light-years. Hence, among our local realm of several thousand Sun-like stars, we would expect only one technological civilization. Since we are such a civilization, we would then be that one—the only one within this part of the Galaxy. To have any real hope of success, then, the search strategy must be directed toward many additional candidate stars far beyond 1000 light-years. Over such vast distances, a two-way dialogue will not exactly be a snappy conversation. A reply to an initial “Hello” may take thousands of years.

As if the problem of where to search weren’t enough, there’s another dilemma. At what frequency should we listen for their beacon? The electromagnetic spectrum is enormous; the radio domain alone covers many orders of magnitude in wavelength. To hope to detect a signal at some unknown radio frequency is like searching for a needle in a haystack. The technique would seem doomed to failure, unless we have some prior information concerning the likely frequencies on which aliens might transmit.

Fortunately, some basic arguments suggest that civilizations will probably communicate at wavelengths around 20 cm. The basic building blocks of the Universe, namely hydrogen (H) atoms, naturally radiate near 21-cm wavelength. And, one of the simplest molecules, hydroxyl (OH), radiates near 18-cm wavelength. Given that these two substances form water (H2O) and that water is likely to be the interaction medium for life anywhere, some researchers have proposed that the interval 18 – 21 cm is the best part of the spectrum for civilizations to transmit or listen. Called the “water hole,” this radio interval might serve as an oasis where all advanced galactic civilizations conduct their electromagnetic business.

The water-hole frequencies comprise only a guess, but they’re supported by other arguments as well. In particular, the wavelength domain from 18 to 21 cm is precisely that part of the entire electromagnetic spectrum—from radio waves all the way across to gamma rays—for which the galactic static from stars and interstellar clouds is minimized. Furthermore, the atmospheres of typical planets, such as our own, are also expected to interfere least at these wavelengths.

Figure shows the water hole’s position in the radio spectrum. This figure also plots the amount of natural emission from our Galaxy and from Earth’s atmosphere, showing how the water hole is positioned within the quietest part of the spectrum. Thus this water hole seems like a good choice for the frequency of an interstellar beacon, although we can’t be sure of this reasoning until contact is actually achieved. Perhaps some other transmitting frequency is better for reasons unknown to us at this time.

FIGURE 8.31 FIGURE — The “water hole” is bounded by the natural emission frequencies of the hydrogen (H) atom at 21-cm wavelength and the hydroxyl (OH) molecule at 18-cm wavelength. The dashed curve sums the natural emissions of our Galaxy and of a planet’s atmosphere (in this case Earth’s). This sum is minimized near the water hole frequencies. Perhaps all smart civilizations conduct their interstellar communications within this quiet “electromagnetic oasis”.

A few passive radio searches are now in progress at frequencies in and around the water hole, yet so far nothing resembling alien signals has been detected. But that’s not surprising, given the small efforts made to date. Attempts to detect extraterrestrials have been so brief in relation to the task at hand that they resemble a “Columbus” who, upon searching for a new route to the Indies, ventured about a kilometer off the coast of Spain. To maximize the chance for success, a dedicated effort is needed—one perhaps requiring hundreds of years of searching on a continuous basis. To have much hope of making contact, we will probably need to monitor millions of stars.

Many uncertainties plague this sort of search strategy, the foremost being the desire of any civilization to transmit. From what we know, transmitting is boring, expensive, and potentially dangerous. Accordingly, perhaps everyone is just listening. If so, then the prospects for contact are dim; to create a dialogue, somebody’s got to start talking.

Other uncertainties concern “language.” Will galactic civilizations be able to find a common language? This puzzle includes not only the difficulty of matching the frequencies of transmission and reception, but also the potential problem of ever being able to understand or appreciate the content of the message. This may be especially troublesome if the transmitting civilization is much more advanced than ourselves. Even a few centuries more progress would likely give them technological prowess hardly imagined here on Earth; just think of the advances we’ve made in the 20th century alone. Extraterrestrials may use means of contact entirely foreign to us. We may be unable to detect their signals or decipher their code. They may be as uncommunicative with us as we are with, for example, dolphins or even ants. All such civilizations may be doomed to loneliness for as long as each survives.

On the other hand, if aliens are eager to contact emerging civilizations in our Galaxy, they will realize that less sophisticated means must be used. They would want to make the task as easy as possible for us, thereby transmitting signals that inexperienced civilizations like ourselves could detect and decipher. Their language would probably be built around mathematics, since counting should be universal: 2 + 2 ought to equal 4 everywhere.

Figure exemplifies how mathematics can be used to send messages through space. In this case, no words are needed, just a picture.

_

FIGURE — In this hypothetical transmission (a), a message is buried within a long series of digital information (dots and dashes, or ones and zeroes). The total number of digits is 725, which is a product of two whole integers 25 and 29. When arranged in a geometrical pattern having 25 rows and 29 columns (b), the message is unrecognizable. But, when arranged in 29 rows and 25 columns (c), the message is clear.

All the many combined uncertainties cause some researchers to be pessimistic. They argue that a search for extraterrestrials is unreasonable and unwarranted. They claim that the assumptions needed to estimate the prospects for extraterrestrial intelligence contain too many unknowns. The search strategy itself contains additional unknowns. They conclude that any expenditure of time, effort, or money for a search is unsupported by the meager evidence at hand.

Proponents argue that we have good reason to suspect that extraterrestrials exist somewhere, given the relative ease of our development on Earth. They admit that we have only a minute chance of making contact in the near future. But they argue that now is the time to test the theory that advanced civilizations inhabit the Galaxy. To fail to try, is to commit the cardinal sin of pre-Renaissance workers—thinking without experimentally testing. Failure to try might also cut prematurely short humankind’s natural exploratory drive. Our longevity as a civilization may be shortened for the very reason that we didn’t undertake the search.

One thing is worth remembering: The space surrounding all of us could be, right now, inundated with radio signals from alien civilizations. If we only knew the proper direction and frequency, we might be able to make one of the most startling discoveries of all time. The result would not only likely provide whole new opportunities to know and understand the cosmic evolution of energy, matter, and life in the Universe, but it might also be the key to our civilization’s long-term survival along the arrow of time.

So You Have Fermi Paradox’s Solution?

The great silence (i.e., absence of SETI signals from alien civilizations) is perhaps the strongest indicator of all that high relativistic velocities are attainable and that everybody out there knows it.

The sobering truth is that relativistic civilizations are a potential nightmare to anyone living within range of them. The problem is that objects traveling at an appreciable fraction of light speed are never where you see them when you see them (i.e., light-speed lag). Relativistic rockets, if their owners turn out to be less than benevolent, are both totally unstoppable and totally destructive. A starship weighing in at 1,500 tons (approximately the weight of a fully fueled space shuttle sitting on the launchpad) impacting an earthlike planet at “only” 30 percent of lightspeed will release 1.5 million megatons of energy — an explosive force equivalent to 150 times today’s global nuclear arsenal… (ed note: this means the freaking thing has about nine hundred mega-Ricks of damage!)

I’m not going to talk about ideas. I’m going to talk about reality. It will probably not be good for us ever to build and fire up an antimatter engine. According to Powell, given the proper detecting devices, a Valkyrie engine burn could be seen out to a radius of several light-years and may draw us into a game we’d rather not play, a game in which, if we appear to be even the vaguest threat to another civilization and if the resources are available to eliminate us, then it is logical to do so.

The game plan is, in its simplest terms, the relativistic inverse to the golden rule: “Do unto the other fellow as he would do unto you and do it first.”…

When we put our heads together and tried to list everything we could say with certainty about other civilizations, without having actually met them, all that we knew boiled down to three simple laws of alien behavior:

1. THEIR SURVIVAL WILL BE MORE IMPORTANT THAN OUR SURVIVAL.
If an alien species has to choose between them and us, they won’t choose us. It is difficult to imagine a contrary case; species don’t survive by being self-sacrificing.

2. WIMPS DON’T BECOME TOP DOGS.
No species makes it to the top by being passive. The species in charge of any given planet will be highly intelligent, alert, aggressive, and ruthless when necessary.

3. THEY WILL ASSUME THAT THE FIRST TWO LAWS APPLY TO US.

Your thinking still seems a bit narrow. Consider several broadening ideas:

  • Sure, relativistic bombs are powerful because the antagonist has already invested huge energies in them that can be released quickly, and they’re hard to hit. But they are costly investments and necessarily reduce other activities the species could explore. For example:
  • Dispersal of the species into many small, hard-to-see targets, such as asteroids, buried civilizations, cometary nuclei, various space habitats. These are hard to wipe out.
  • But wait — while relativistic bombs are readily visible to us in foresight, they hardly represent the end point in foreseeable technology. What will humans of, say, two centuries hence think of as the “obvious” lethal effect? Five centuries? A hundred? Personally I’d pick some rampaging self-reproducing thingy (mechanical or organic), then sneak it into all the biospheres I wanted to destroy. My point here is that no particular physical effect — with its pluses, minuses, and trade-offs — is likely to dominate the thinking of the galaxy.
  • So what might really aged civilizations do? Disperse, of course, and also not attack new arrivals in the galaxy, for fear that they might not get them all. Why? Because revenge is probably selected for in surviving species, and anybody truly looking out for long-term interests will not want to leave a youthful species with a grudge, sneaking around behind its back…

I agree with most parts of points 2, 3, and 4. As for point 1, it is cheaper than you think. You mention self-replicating machines in point 3, and while it is true that relativistic rockets require planetary power supplies, it is also true that we can power the whole Earth with a field of solar cells adding up to barely more than 200-by-200 kilometers, drawn out into a narrow band around the Moon’s equator. Self-replicating robots could accomplish this task with only the cost of developing the first twenty or thirty machines. And once we’re powering the Earth practically free of charge, why not let the robots keep building panels on the Lunar far side? Add a few self-replicating linear accelerator-building factories, and plug the accelerators into the panels, and you could produce enough anti-hydrogen to launch a starship every year. But why stop at the Moon? Have you looked at Mercury lately? …

Dr. Wells has obviously bought into the view of a friendly galaxy. This view is based upon the argument that unless we humans conquer our self-destructive warlike tendencies, we will wipe out our species and no longer be a threat to extrasolar civilizations. All well and good up to this point.

But then these optimists make the jump: If we are wise enough to survive and not wipe ourselves out, we will be peaceful — so peaceful that we will not wipe anybody else out, and as we are below on Earth, so other people will be above.

This is a non sequitur, because there is no guarantee that one follows the other, and for a very important reason: “They” are not part of our species.

Before we proceed any further, try the following thought experiment: watch the films Platoon and Aliens together and ask yourself if the plot lines don’t quickly blur and become indistinguishable. You’ll recall that in Vietnam, American troops were taught to regard the enemy as “Charlie” or “Gook,” dehumanizing words that made “them” easier to kill. In like manner, the British, Spanish, and French conquests of the discovery period were made easier by declaring dark- or red- or yellow-skinned people as something less than human, as a godless, faceless “them,” as literally another species.

Presumably there is some sort of inhibition against killing another member of our own species, because we have to work to overcome it…

But the rules do not apply to other species. Both humans and wolves lack inhibitions against killing chickens.

Humans kill other species all the time, even those with which we share the common bond of high intelligence. As you read this, hundreds of dolphins are being killed by tuna fishermen and drift netters. The killing goes on and on, and dolphins are not even a threat to us.

As near as we can tell, there is no inhibition against killing another species simply because it displays a high intelligence. So, as much as we love him, Carl Sagan’s theory that if a species makes it to the top and does not blow itself apart, then it will be nice to other intelligent species is probably wrong. Once you admit interstellar species will not necessarily be nice to one another simply by virtue of having survived, then you open up this whole nightmare of relativistic civilizations exterminating one another.

It’s an entirely new situation, emerging from the physical possibilities that will face any species that can overcome the natural interstellar quarantine of its solar system. The choices seem unforgiving, and the mind struggles to imagine circumstances under which an interstellar species might make contact without triggering the realization that it can’t afford to be proven wrong in its fears.

Got that? We can’t afford to wait to be proven wrong.

They won’t come to get our resources or our knowledge or our women or even because they’re just mean and want power over us. They’ll come to destroy us to insure their survival, even if we’re no apparent threat, because species death is just too much to risk, however remote the risk…

The most humbling feature of the relativistic bomb is that even if you happen to see it coming, its exact motion and position can never be determined; and given a technology even a hundred orders of magnitude above our own, you cannot hope to intercept one of these weapons. It often happens, in these discussions, that an expression from the old west arises: “God made some men bigger and stronger than others, but Mr. Colt made all men equal.” Variations on Mr. Colt’s weapon are still popular today, even in a society that possesses hydrogen bombs. Similarly, no matter how advanced civilizations grow, the relativistic bomb is not likely to go away…

We ask that you try just one more thought experiment. Imagine yourself taking a stroll through Manhattan, somewhere north of 68th street, deep inside Central Park, late at night. It would be nice to meet someone friendly, but you know that the park is dangerous at night. That’s when the monsters come out. There’s always a strong undercurrent of drug dealings, muggings, and occasional homicides.

It is not easy to distinguish the good guys from the bad guys. They dress alike, and the weapons are concealed. The only difference is intent, and you can’t read minds.

Stay in the dark long enough and you may hear an occasional distance shriek or blunder across a body.

How do you survive the night? The last thing you want to do is shout, “I’m here!” The next to last thing you want to do is reply to someone who shouts, “I’m a friend!”

What you would like to do is find a policeman, or get out of the park. But you don’t want to make noise or move towards a light where you might be spotted, and it is difficult to find either a policeman or your way out without making yourself known. Your safest option is to hunker down and wait for daylight, then safely walk out.

There are, of course, a few obvious differences between Central Park and the universe.

There is no policeman.

There is no way out.

And the night never ends.

Bill Seney points out a slight flaw in the above argument:

Attacking with relativistic rockets may be a good idea if there are only two technological species, but if there are two then it seems to me that it is likely there will be more. Using a relativistic rocket to destroy a planet will reveal your position AND indicate that you are hostile to any possible third race that is out there.

To extend the Central Park analogy, the muzzle flash when you fire off your gun reveals your position and identifies that you are hostile to anyone else out there.


U.S. military is liaising with extraterrestrial life..

Independent sources have claimed an on-going set of face-to-face meetings between U.S. military officials and extraterrestrial life. The sources reveal that senior U.S. Navy officers have played a leading role in an inter-services working group responsible for the meetings, and that different extraterrestrial groups are allegedly involved. One source claims that the contact involves extraterrestrial groups known as Reptilians, and a silicon based life form dubbed ‘the Conformers’. Another source claims that the extraterrestrials are called Ebens from the Zeta Reticuli star system, but known colloquially as the Grays. A third source claims that human looking extraterrestrials representing an association of star nations are liaising with military officials. Two of the sources have been interviewed by this writer who has been aware of their claims for more than a year, and finds them credible. The similarities in these independent reports gives reason to conclude that an ongoing program of secret meetings involving senior military personal from the U.S. Navy and other military services with one or more extraterrestrial civilizations is underway.

One source claiming to have participated in face-to-face meetings is a serving U.S. Navy officer that inFebruary 2008 revealed the existence of a confidential set of meetings at the UN where UFOs and extraterrestrial life were discussed. Known as Source A, the Navy officer claims that he was sanctioned by a working group comprising a number of admirals to disclose the UN talks without revealing his identity. In June 2008, Source A claims he was assigned to another project that involved direct meetings with two groups of extraterrestrials in a covert project where he was sanctioned to board their spacecraft on three different occasions. One group is a Reptilian looking species, and another is a silicon based life form he dubbed the ‘Conformers’.

This author and a number of other researchers have met with and interviewed Source A, and have been able to confirm that he is a serving U.S. Navy officer. Recently, two New York based UFO investigators, Clay and Shawn Pickering, gave a three hour interview concerning Source A’s involvement in a covert project involving face-to-face meetings with extraterrestrial life. They revealed that a covert inter-services working group has attempted to brief President Obama about the extraterrestrial liaison project. Given Source A’s identity and unlikelihood that more senior U.S. Navy officials would sanction a serving officer to openly misinform the general public over extraterrestrial life, there is reason to take his claims of participating in a covert project involving face-to-face meetings very seriously.

An anonymous source associated with the Defense Intelligence Agency recently claimed that military officials on November 12, 2009, met with extraterrestrials called Ebens, from the Zeta Reticula star system, on Akau Atoll in the Johnston Islands. The alleged meeting was part of an ongoing set of diplomatic discussions and exchanges that date several decades. The information was the latest installment related to an alleged classified project called Serpo, a secret exchange program with extraterrestrial visitors from Zeta Reticulum. According to Victor Martinez, who maintains a large email list where he distributes Project Serpo reports released to him by ‘anonymous’:

… the Ebens met on Akau Island with a total of 18 representatives from the U.S., United Nations, Russia, China, the Vatican and certain other guests. U.S. representatives are said to have included five military personnel, two intelligence officers, one linguist and one person representing the Obama administration.

The Johnston Islands are a U.S. territory and lie 750 miles south west of Honolulu. That places the Islands directly under the military authority of Pacific Command that historically has been run by the U.S. Navy. Although the latest Project Serpo release does not identify the service of the five military personnel at the alleged meeting, the choice of Johnston Atoll suggests a leading role for U.S. Navy officials in the latest face-to-face meeting.

The Serpo story raises considerable controversy with many inconsistencies in the claims of the sources revealing the Serpo information. Nevertheless, there are many events revealed in the Serpo story that are very likely based on real events such as President Reagan being secretly briefed at some point about extraterrestrial life. A number of Reagan’s public statements are circumstantial evidence that he did receive such a briefing. An alleged transcript of the briefing was released as part of the Serpo material in November 2007. This author’s assessment is that the Serpo releases mix real events with fiction in an officially sanctioned acclimation program. While the Serpo material requires much discernment given the level of disinformation in it, it is very likely that it accurately reveals the existence of secret military meetings with extraterrestrials, but mixes this with contrived details. The implicit leading role of the U.S. Navy in the alleged Akau meeting is consistent with the revelations of Source A.

The third and final anonymous source has revealed face-to-face meetings between U.S. military officials and human looking representatives of extraterrestrial civilizations. Again officers from the U.S. Navy are described as playing an active role, and are deeply involved in promoting public disclosure of the existence of extraterrestrial life. What distinguishes this alleged set of military meetings with extraterrestrials is that according to the source, the meetings were convened due to distrust over the way a covert international control group initially called “MJ-12” ” (current name unknown), has been managing information and technology concerning extraterrestrial life. The various military representatives were apparently shocked over the extent to which “MJ-12” has deceived them in oversight and management of extraterrestrial affairs.

In conclusion, there is very real dissatisfaction in the U.S. military, especially officers from the Navy, over the way in which extraterrestrial affairs has been secretly run and managed by a covert transnational group initially known as “MJ-12. The dissatisfaction can be traced back to an incident involving a Vice-Admiral serving as the head of Intelligence for the Joint Chiefs of Staff who was denied access to a covert extraterrestrial related project under corporate control. The incident was in June 2008 publicly revealed on Larry King Live by former Apollo Astronaut Edgar Mitchell (see video clip). Since at least 1997, groups of U.S. Navy officers through covert inter-service working groups have been trying to restore military/government oversight over extraterrestrial affairs that has been increasingly privatized in the corporate world.The details of alleged face to face meetings between U.S. military/Navy personnel with extraterrestrial life is not known with great accuracy due to conflicting accounts of representatives of what occurred at such meetings. Nevertheless, given three independent sources reveal such meetings, two of which have been personally confirmed by the author as credible, it can be concluded that extraterrestrial military liaisons are currently underway. Retired officers from the two military services making up the Department of the Navy (US Navy and US Marine Corps) feature prominently in the Obama administration. These include Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence (ret Admiral, USN); James Jones, National Security Advisor (ret. General, USMC); and Charles Bolden, NASA Administrator (ret. General, USMC). Consequently, a U.S. military extraterrestrial liaison program that is being leaked to the public by US Navy officers from a covert inter-services working group will encourage the Obama administration to move forward with a public announcement concerning the reality of extraterrestrial life.

via


http://www.examiner.com/x-2383-Honolulu-Exopolitics-Examiner~y2009m12d28-US-military-is-liaising-with-extraterrestrial-life-according-to-independent-sources

Are We Alone?

Kirsty asked:

Is humanity alone in the universe?

Is humanity alone? No. Period. As Douglas Adams says, the universe is a really big place. The question is, why haven’t we had contact? Well, you know, I actually don’t think that’s a hard question. First, how long have we been looking? 50 years, max? Second, how could aliens find us, out here on the edge of the galaxy, until we waved at them, which we’ve only been doing for about 100 years, a mere tick of the clock, using a method so primitive that even creatures with our minimal intelligence can employ it (i.e., radio)? Third, and most important, how have we been looking? We’ve been using telescopes, a ridiculous method, and lately, with SETI, some few radio frequencies. Not unreasonable, given that aliens are like us… but why should that be true?


Let’s put this in perspective. Suppose that dogs were trying to signal another species of dog. How would they do it? By barking or howling, right? Would we notice that, as a signal of that type? Would we care? How much smarter, given some theoretical maximal potential for intelligence, are we than dogs? Infinitesimally, I would say. Our brains must fit, badly, inside our heads, folded up, in order to have expanded to the amount they have, which is about all our bodies will take, both in volume and metabolically.

Suppose we found out how to increase head size, or produce more efficient folding, or better, connect ourselves to our computers? Where would our intelligence go then? In the latter case, the practical limits would be… well, I certainly can’t even begin to envision it. Now, given that we could be, let us conservatively say, 100 times more intelligent than now, how would we signal… what indeed would our picture of the universe be, our physics, our electronics? We are not now 100 times smarter than dogs. How would our physics compare with our present idea of physics? Etc. You see my point? To aliens, if they notice us at all, we are, until we can consciously increase our intelligence, merely another species of animal on this planet. So why should they want to contact us, any more than we would want to contact those dogs? And how would we notice or understand it, if they did, any more than dogs could conceive, build, and use a radio set?

That’s one of my theories, I think the most likely one. The next most likely one is this: look at the way computers are going. What if we are able to “scan” our brains totally, convert our neural dynamics into another form, and embody ourselves within a computer (a very large one, of course, and a radically different type from present digital computers, but those are — for the purpose of this discussion — quibbles). I mean, totally move into the computer, as a dynamic pattern in it. And not just ourselves, buteveryone and our civilization… living in a virtual world, having anything we want happen (virtually, of course, but we wouldn’t see any difference), and being immortal (as long as the computer wasn’t hit by a meteor, etc.). Now wouldn’t that be wonderful? Think about it. Anything you wanted, any life, any environment, any physical laws, no risk, no death… as long as you want.

Now, if I were an alien civilization faced with that possibility, vs. living in the cold, hard, limited real universe, hey, why not? So the second theory is that we can’t contact them because when a civilization gets advanced to that stage, they just all move into their computer(s) and live happily ever after, in a virtual heaven of their own design, with the computer protected behind layers of armor and powered by something reasonably perpetual. Sounds good to me, anyway. So that’s my second theory as to why we haven’t and won’t contact them. They’re out there, zillions of them. They’re just living luxuriously in the basement, so to speak, hoping to go unnoticed for as long as possible.

Or it could be a combination of the two above, with extremely advanced virtual civilizations communicating with each other by means unavailable (and incomprehensible) to us, until we get to that point.

Jean Schneider (2009). The question Are We Alone ? in different cultures arxiv.org arXiv: 0905.4132v2

Bookmark and Share

The UFO navigation interpreted as fluctuations within Quantum Vacuum

This article explains why the traditional physicists resist the concept of any extraterrestrial UFOs. Our terrestrial physics is blind. It just cannot ‘see’ the navigation within higher spatial dimensions or in quantum vacuum. In this article, we explain why revision of our standard basic description of gravitational phenomena is necessary, either by the introduction of dark matter or energy, or by a modification of fundamental laws of mechanics or gravitation.

Forces induced by vacuum fluctuations do not raise any problem with respect to the principle of Special Relativity. The reaction of vacuum vanishes in the particular case of uniform velocity. This property is easily interpreted in the quantum formalism. The vacuum fluctuations appear exactly the same to an inertial observer and to an observer at rest. The principle of relativity of motion conforms to the standard model in vacuum under Lorentz transformations, so that, within the quantum framework, a precise relation is established between this principle and the symmetries of vacuum. More generally, vacuum forces also vanish for uniformly accelerated motions and this property corresponds to conformal symmetry of quantum vacuum. In this sense, vacuum fluctuations set a class of privileged reference frames for the definition of mechanical motions. But the existence of effects associated with non uniform motions in quantum vacuum challenges the principle of relativity of motion in its more general form of acceptance. Observable effects may be produced, like a reaction force against motion, although no reference for this motion other than vacuum fluctuations themselves may be available. This means in particular that the space in which motion takes place can no longer be considered as empty. This is because vacuum fluctuations are always present, and that may constitute a universal reference for determining dissipative motions.

The observations from classical astrphysics require a revision of our standard basic description of gravitational phenomena, either by the introduction of dark matter or dark energy, or by a modification of fundamental laws of mechanics or gravitation.

No wonder our terrestrial physics is blind. No wonder we still fight over the existence of UFOs. It is time for physicists to challenge the basic fundamental laws of mechanics and gravity.

So What About ET Life…?

Not a month goes by that
we don’t hear about
someone being kidnapped
by aliens, or, worse, saw
little green men land and
eat a field of corn. There
are always sightings of
UFO’s, and, of course, the
one major controversial;
issue remains “unsolved:
The incident at Roswell,
New Mexico in 1947.
But, from a scientific point
of view, in our solar
system chances of life
seems nearly impossible.
And, we’re not talking
about little green men or
some other living
creatures, but rather, fossil
remains that might be
evidence of life having
once existed. Mars, closest
to Earth, is always a
“suspect.” “The evidence
for life on other planets is
slim to the point of non-
existence. The discovery of
polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons in a
meteorite fragment
supposedly from Mars… is
headline-grabbing stuff….
The normally cautious
journal, Science, decided
to… relax its usual news-
embargo rule and allow
the scientists to talk about
their findings on Aug 7,
well before the planned
publication of the report
on Aug 16. But does
probing inside a meteorite
and finding organic
molecules and other
imprints of primitive and
ancient bioactivity prove
that there was once life on
Mars (the planet is now far
too cold)?” While there are
many who say “Of course
not!” final proof is still not
totally confirmed.
What we should consider
is not necessarily that
there is now valid proof
that there is some sort of
life outside the Earth, but
the possibility that there is
some sort of life. “The
expectation that
extraterrestrial
intelligence exists derives
from two facts and one
assumption: (1) the
universe is vast, with
hundreds of billions of
galaxies each containing
hundreds of billions of
stars. NASA alleges there
are zillions of uncountable
stars. This number is so
large that even if the
emergence of intelligence
is improbable, such
intelligence could still
have arisen frequently. (2)
The physics and chemistry
of the universe are
everywhere the same. This
is known from
astronomical observation.
(3) Habitable, Earth-like
planets of the type that
might spawn intelligence,
with thick atmospheres
and liquid water on their
surface, are not
extraordinarily rare. This is
a hypothesis, sometimes
called the principle of
mediocrity. According to
this principle, the Earth is
not extraordinary in any
of its important
properties”
As new, more powerful
search instruments scan
the universe, the
possibility (if not the
probability) that there is
life out there somewhere,
is still a major topic of
discussion: “The Hubble
Space Telescope may have
discovered as many as 100
new planets out beyond
our solar system orbiting
stars in the Milky Way
galaxy, astronomers say….
Astronomers are coming
to believe that almost
every sun-like star in the
galaxy, and probably in
the universe, is
accompanied by one or
more planets like our solar
system, vastly increasing
the chance that some form
of extraterrestrial life
could exist”. NASA is not
the only organization
looking for some sort of
extraterrestrial proof.
“More surprises are almost
certain to follow if
astronomers find more
and more planets circling
other stars. But while
finding new planets of any
sort is terrifically exciting,
says Alan Boss, an
astronomer at the
Carnegie Institution of
Washington, “the Holy
Grail is to find an
extrasolar planet that is
capable of supporting life.”
Most scientists involved in
the search have never said
DEFINITELY NO to the
possibility of
extraterrestrial life. But, so
far there is no positive
proof. The ordinary citizen,
when he hears the term
“Extraterrestrial”
immediately thinks of
some weird human-like
form (i.e., the Martian
“green men), but chances
are when and if life is
discovered elsewhere in
the Universe it may very
well not have a form or
shape anything like
human life on Earth. Last
month a newspaper article
reinforced this “non-
human” fact: “Bad news,
Star Trek fans: If there is
life on other worlds, it
probably doesn’t look like
a swimsuit model. A
scientist at Washington
State University says the
first extraterrestrial life we
find is likely to be single-
celled organisms surviving
in a moon of Saturn, or the
atmosphere of Venus. And
not a Borg Queen in sight.
Dirk Schulze-Makuch
recently co-authored the
book “Life in the
Universe,” in which he and
Louis N. Irwin of the
University of Texas-El Paso
theorize on where
humans should look for
signs of other”.
So, if we continue to look,
what sort of “life” might
we expect? “If
extraterrestrial life exists
in our Solar System, it is
probably no more
advanced than bacteria. In
recent years, biologists
have discovered bacteria
on Earth living in
conditions that were once
thought too hostile for
life, for example in
Antarctic ice, in super-hot
ocean vents, and in rock
deep in the Earth. These
types of bacteria are called
extremophiles, because
they love extreme
conditions like heat or
acidity or saltiness”. Even
here one realizes that the
expectations that “life” is
another humanoid form
would be a mistake.
“What would aliens look
like?…Would we expect
the same (as human form)
on another planet- in
other words millions of
species but only one with
high intelligence?”. What
is of interest here is that
Parker, and others,
consider Man on Earth to
be the only species with
high intelligence, and
therefore, even if some life
forms would be found in
spacer, would they have
intelligence or be, as the
Earth was at its origin,
simple one- or two=-cell
life forms which
eventually developed into
something of a higher
power.
While some scientists look
to other solar systems,
there are those who still
try to determine if any
planets in our solar system
are “habitable.” “Our own
solar system contains four
terrestrial planets within
the inner part of the solar
system. Three of these
planets provide
substantial clues as to
what might determine the
boundaries of the
habitable zone”. He
believes that Venus may
be too hot for water, a
necessity for any sort of
life form. Mars, he
speculates “appears to
have been within (the
habitable zone) during its
early history”. His point, as
it is for many astronomers
and other biological
scientists is that we are
too early in our
understanding of the
universe to see where and
if life exists. “Many, if not
most scientists today
believe that it is very likely
that life exists on planets
other than the Earth”.
It is important in this
discussion to realize that
“life” is a relative term.
And, therefore, it is
important to reiterate that
we may never find any
sort of human-like form,
as Parker considers it- a
higher intelligence life
form. So, Parker makes a
good point: What should
we look for, given the
possibility and even
eventuality that we may
discover some sort of life
form in the universe
outside Earth? No one has
dared to make an
educated guess.
A skeptic may well argue:
“So what? What would it
mean to discover some
sort of life form outside of
Earth?” His reasoning is
that it would neither
improve the quality of our
life nor would it do
anything to reduce famine
and disease, lengthen life-
spans or make oppressed
people free. So, why do
we spend millions to
determine if there is life
out there somewhere?
There is no reasonable
answer except to state
that science is made up of
curiosity, and the desire to
find out for sure that life
exists somewhere else in
the universe drives
hundreds of dedicated
scientists to continue to
search.
There is another aspect to
life elsewhere that needs
to be mentioned: The
supposed sightings of
UFOs, the purported
“visits” of aliens. “Several
astronomers have pointed
out that we may be the
only advanced civilization
in our galaxy…(and) if
other civilizations have
emerged; many of them
would have emerged
millions of years ago,
perhaps billions of years
ago. It is difficult to
imagine what a
civilization millions of
years old could have
accomplished. Considering
what we have
accomplished in only a
few centuries”. Parker
then guesses that if the
Earth did have alien
visitors, it would have
occurred tens of
thousands of years ago,
not in 1947 or more
recently. That does make
him right, only another
one to do guess work.
There are many
experiments and
investigations currently
underway. Some we know
about, others seem to be
top secret. The goal is to
either prove or disprove
once and for all that there
is- or is not-
extraterrestrial life out
there. The only thing we
know for sure is that we
don’t know for sure. But,
we continue to look.
Whether in our life time,
we will ever get a
definitive answer is
doubtful, given the limited
funds and equipment
available. So, we do need
to ask ourselves: “If we
find life elsewhere, how
will it change our lives?”

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 146 other followers

%d bloggers like this: