White hole

White holes are similar to black gold except white holes are ejecting matter versus black hole are absorbing matter. In 1916, Karl Schwarzschild derived the first model of a black hole using Einsteins theory. Nothing , not even a particles moving at a velocity of light, can escape the gravitational pull of a black hole. The existence of black hole is implied by a negative square root solution to the Schwarzschild for space time matter continuum.. It is important to remember that black hole and white hole can be composed from matter and Antimatter. A wormhole , which joins whiteholes is known as Einstein-Rosen bridge and is one of the most fascinating concept in theoretical physics. In 1962 John Wheeler discovered the Einstein Rosen bridge space-time-matter metric. Theoretically , a wormhole could be stablized to allow a safe equilibrium between matter and Antimatter, whiteholes. To stablize the worn hold, the throat of singularity contains matter and Antimatter , whitehole which are spherical in nature. The Antimatter has a negative mass and exerts a positive surface pressure . The Einstein Rosen bridge keeps the matter and Antimatter black holes separated. The oscillations between the black holes at opposite end of the wormhole force the black hole to become whitehole that eject matter and Antimatter in opposite directior forming the spiral arms of the stars within the galactic discs. Einsteins’s equations specify what the energy momentum content of matter must be in an area to produce the needed geometry.


About bruceleeeowe
An engineering student and independent researcher. I'm researching and studying quantum physics(field theories). Also searching for alien life.

3 Responses to White hole

  1. Hasanuddin says:

    the problem with theories regarding wormholes is that even though the math appears clean, there is no corroborating evidence in the physical data record for matter being “ejected.” Given the amount of space viewable from Earth, such an observation should have been recorded by now if this scenario were, in fact, correct… but it hasn’t.

    It looks like you enjoy thinking outside of the box. Good, that is the trait of all true scientists. I invite you to come and view the debate raging over a new cosmologic model I am advancing. Take your best shot and try to prove it incorrect… that’s the scientific process.


  2. Bruceleeeowe says:

    I can argue that theoretically it should be true as matter has opposite properties to Antimatter and vice versa. And if this is true, there is no need of producing energy from matter ,Antimatter interaction especially for propulsion matter and Antimatter should repel each other and That’s idea. I’m working too on these theories. I’m going to visit link you have provided. And I like to accept your invitation, and I’m with you.

  3. Pingback: Space Time:Continuums And Curvature « Bruceleeeowe's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: