Evolution VS Creation:Part-I

THERE ARE NO MAN-APES AND NO APE-MEN, and all that baloney you read about and see pictures of in most of today’s biology textbooks is just hellish, fiendish, tommyrot! All those half-ape, half-man ape-men and man-apes, screaming and grinning and groaning like a bunch of horrors from some nether-world down in the depths of hell are imaginary monsters created by the fiendish mind of the Devil and promulgated by men.

And although we do not usually like to soil our fingers or pollute our minds with the dirty lies of dirty liars, it might be helpful to some of you if we at least balance the scales with the truth while pointing out a few of the ridiculous boners and fallacies of the theory of “the descent of man,” which is currently taught as gospel truth and historical fact by most of today’s “educators.”

This might at least clarify the issues in your own minds and give you a little more effective ammunition to fire back at them in defense of the truth so you can “be ready always to give an answer to every man that asketh you,” as the Apostle Peter said (1Pet.3:15). We will now briefly examine the most famous of the fossil remains which are supposed to have been the forerunners of modern man and the theories surrounding them.

YOU WILL NOTICE THAT THE EVOLUTIONISTS HAVE CHOSEN SOME VERY LONG AND DIFFICULT-TO-PRONOUNCE NAMES FOR THEIR “MISSING-LINKS”, the foundation stones, or bones, on which their faith is built. Doing this sort of thing envelopes it all with a shroud of mystery and even puts a little superstitious awe into the minds of the average laymen. Like many other religious authorities, the high priests of the “sacred cow” of false-science has done this to give credence to their faith and to gain reverence for themselves!

Darwin claimed that “The Simiadae (monkeys) branched off into two great stems, The New World and The Old World monkeys; and from the latter, at a remote period, Man, the wonder and glory of the universe, proceeded.” In other words, great and glorious man evolved himself from a monkey and was not created by God in His image, as the Bible says!

However, THE SCIENTISTS SOON FOUND IT IMPOSSIBLE to reconstruct a halfway believable evolutionary chain showing man rising from the ape family, so they had to cook up a new theory–which they promptly did!

NOW the modern evolutionists believe that man came not from the apes, but from an older, more primitive primate who was the common ancestor of both the apes and man! But as far as any fossil evidence to prove this new theory, New Scientist magazine commented: “The unmistakable correspondence between man and anthropoids points clearly to a common ancestor. BUT IT HAS NOT YET BEEN FOUND AND WE MAY HAVE SOME DIFFICULTY IN RECOGNIZING IT.”

As for any EVIDENCE to prove early man’s progressive evolution FROM this supposed “common ancestor,” the prominent evolutionists who wrote the book The Primates confessed, “Unfortunately, the early stages of man’s evolutionary progress along his individual line remain A TOTAL MYSTERY.”

Scientific American likewise stated: “The nature of the line leading to living man … remains A MATTER OF PURE THEORY.” So the very basis or foundation of the evolutionary teaching that man has descended from a lower, ape-like form is “a matter of pure theory,” cooked up by a bunch of nincompoops who are perpetrating on the world what the Bible refers to as “the VAIN BABBLINGS OF SCIENCE FALSELY SO CALLED.” (1Tim.6:20)

The first actual fossils that the evolutionist classify as “the earliest known form of man” are said to belong to a species called “THE AUSTRALOPITHECINES,” or the “man-apes” of Africa. Although their brains were only a third as large as modern man’s, it is theorised by some that they were toolmakers and therefore men. But even many of the evolutionists, including the famed explorer and anthropologist J.T. Robinson, have disputed this, claiming that the tool-making was not done by these so-called “man-apes” at all, but by true men!

Another well-known evolutionist, Le Gros Clark, warned of the Australopithecines: “The terms ‘man’ and ‘human’ can only be applied to them with some reserve, for there is NO CERTAIN EVIDENCE that they possessed any of the special attributes which are commonly associated with the human beings of today.” And R.L. Lehrman, another evolutionist, wrote in his book, “AUSTRALOPITHECUS WAS MERELY AN UPRIGHT, INTELLIGENT APE, NOT A MAN. The small braincase bearing heavy ridges over the eyes, across the back, and down the center was like that of any ape.”

The next fella the evolutionists usually show us on their near little evolutionary sequence from monkey to to man is “PITHECANTHROPUS ERECTUS,” whom they affectionately refer to as “JAVAMAN” for short. He was discovered in a Javanese river bed in 1891 by Professor Dubois, a young Dutchman who was greatly influenced by the erroneous teachings of Ernst Haeckle. Haeckle was an ardent German evolutionist who concocted and was caught in several ‘scientific’ frauds’ openly praised and perpetrated evolutionary theory as a means by which he hoped to destroy Christianity and all faiths in God, and was the first to construct the imaginary evolutionary “family tree” showing how life rose from non-life and how today’s creatures evolved from more primitive forms.

The section of Haeckle’s fraudulent family tree that most interested and eventually obsessed young Dubois was the branch which led from ape to man, where, by an act of blind faith, Haeckle had placed an unknown, undiscovered “link” whom he named “Pithecanthropus erectus,” which literally means “walking ape-man.”

DUBOIS WAS CHALLENGED WITH THE THOUGHT OF PERSONALLY DISCOVERING THE “MISSING-LINK” and soon forsook home and career as he set out for Java, where in 1887 he began a determined search, digging doggedly for the as yet unknown bones. Then four years later this dog had his day and Dubois’ moment of glory arrived as he gleefully made his announcement to a waiting world: At last, out ancient ancestor, the long sought “link” between man and monkey was found! Thus was “Java Man” born and christened with the name his godless godfather Haeckle had reserved for him, “Pithecanthropus erectus.”

HIS FAME AND ACCLAIM WERE IMMEDIATE and today in almost any museum of natural history you can find elaborate busts and reconstructions of him, giving his viewers the impression that they are beholding a creature who was found like the mastodon, embedded in ice, perfectly preserved for our awe and admiration. Or if you prefer full-colour portraits of him romping about in his natural habitat with his friends and fellows, you need but consult any standard textbook on biology or anthropology and there you’ll find him in colourful detail–showing that, indeed, the very hairs of his head are numbered.

Little does the uninformed person imagine that these awe-inspiring masterpieces are the reconstructions of THREE MOLAR TEETH, A FRAGMENT OF A SKULL CAP, AND A LEFT THIGH BONE — found over 50 feet apart in an old riverbed in Java! Neither do they tell you. as does the 1949 textbook Mankind So Far, that after the world had accepted Dubois’ “missing link”, “One voice alone now cried that the Java Man was not a man, but a giant, tree-walking gibbon. … And here it was that Pithecanthropus felt the unkindest cut of all. For the voice was the voice of Dr. Dubois himself.” Yes after further studying his fossils, Dubois decided and announced with certainty that “Java Man” was merely an extinct ape or monkey, and was not the “missing link” after all!

“THE DISCOVERY WHICH RANKS NEXT IN IMPORTANCE,” reports the Encyclopedia Brittanica in its 1946 edition, “was made by Mr. Charles Dawson at Piltdown, Sussex, between the years 1911 and 1915. He found the greater part of the left half of a deeply mineralized human skull, also part of the right half; the right half of the lower jaw, damaged at certain parts but carrying the first and second molar teeth and the socket of the third molar or wisdom tooth.”

“Amongst British authorities there is now agreement that the skull and the jaw are parts of the same individual.” These remains came to be known as the famous “PILTDOWN MAN” OR “EOANTHROPUS DAWSONI” (dawn man of Dawson) in honour of their devout discoverer, Charles Dawson. However, Dawson’s honour soon diminished and another “missing link” bit the dust as the world found out that Piltdown Man’s resurrection involved considerable monkey business! As Science Newsletter tells us:

“ONE OF THE MOST FAMOUS FAKES EXPOSED BY SCIENTIFIC PROOF WAS PILTDOWN MAN, found in Sussex, England … and thought by some to be 500,000 years old. After much controversy, it turned out to be not a primitive man at all, but a composite of a skull of modern man and the jawbone of an ape. … The jawbone had been ‘doctored’ with bichromate of potash and iron to make it look mineralized.”

PILTDOWN MAN’S TEETH ALSO REVEALED SOME NOT-TOO-PRIMITIVE DENTAL WORK: They had all been filed down to make them appear more ancient. In fact, Reader’s Digest pointed out: “Every important piece proved a forgery. Piltdown Man was a fraud from start to finish! … All the circumstantial evidence points to Dawson as the author of the hoax.” 33 –HA!

The next gentleman the evolutionists introduce us to in this imaginary journey on their non-existent road from monkey to man is a certain “NEANDERTHAL MAN.” He is often kindly referred to as “the best known of our fossil relatives,” and like “Java Man” you can easily find convincing full-colour photograph-like portraits of him hunting and cooking his supper, chatting with his mates around the campfire, doing his household or cavehold chores, etc. In such illustrations he is usually very hairy, ape-like and moronic looking, just what you’d expect a “missing link” to look like. However a recent edition of The Collegiate Encyclopedia wrote regarding Neanderthal Man’s bestiality:

“As a consequence of preconceived notions as to what Neanderthal Man should have looked like, an unfortunate myth has been perpetrated upon several generations respecting his appearance. He has been traditionally represented with a bull neck, knock knees, a stooped gait and a rather bestial appearance. The truth is that Neanderthal Man had none of these traits, that he walked erect and that his appearance was almost certainly not less benign than that of contemporary man.

“A remarkable fact about Neanderthal Man is that in males brain volume varied between 1,425 and 1,641 cc. with an average of 1,553 cc. The average brain volume of contemporary man is about 1,350 cc. Thus the average size of the brain in Neanderthal Man was substantially greater than it is contemporary man.” 34

SO THE SO-CALLED “NEANDERTHAL MAN” WAS “NOT LESS BENIGN” IN HIS APPEARANCE THAN YOU OR I, AND HIS AVERAGE BRAIN SIZE WAS “SUBSTANTIALLY GREATER” THAN OURS! This indicates that mankind is not evoluting–but if anything he’s devoluting or degenerating which is what I’ve said for years. Man today has devolved and degenerated–and that’s why you can see some people running around today looking like missing links, because of degeneration and sin and devolution.

THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT THE BIBLE PREDICTED ABOUT THE END TIME when it said, “In the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be lovers of their own selves … ever learning (today’s educational system!), and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth … evil men and seducers shall wax (or grow) WORSE AND WORSE, deceiving and being deceived!” (2Tim.3) And this is what’s happening today–mankind is not “progressing towards perfection”35 as Darwin promised, but is growing “worse and worse” as the Bible predicted!

This same “Last Days” passage also warned that “THE TIME WILL COME WHEN THEY WILL NOT ENDURE SOUND DOCTRINE (the truth); but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears (ears that want to be tickled with lies!). And THEY SHALL TURN AWAY THEIR EARS FROM THE TRUTH, AND SHALL BE TURNED UNTO FABLES!” This time has come, and these days are here, and their ears have turned from the truth and they are turned unto fables!–Like evolution!

Another disturbing problem which confronts and baffles the evolutionists is the fact that THE REMAINS OF MODERN TYPE, “HOMO-SAPIENS” MEN HAVE BEEN FOUND IN THE SAME STRATA AND EVEN IN EARLIER, MORE ANCIENT STRATA THAN THE SO-CALLED “PREHISTORIC” MEN. Professor A.M. Winchester said in his book, Biology and its Relationship to Mankind, “The remains of Swanscombe Man in Europe, the Kanjera Man in Africa, and others suggest that true man (modern type) may have existed as long as 300,000 years ago,* which would have made him a contemporary of homo erectus (Java man).” * Later in this lesson you will see why we do not agree with this “300,000 years” calculation–we are merely quoting Prof. Winchester here to show you that even the scientists must admit that modern men were around at the same time as the so-called “Java Man.”

Other remains of modern-type men found in a lower, older layer than their supposedly more primitive “prehistoric ancestors” were unearthed in 1947 at FonteChevade, France. As for these fossils, whose brain volume was calculated to be 1,470 cc, The Collegiate Encyclopedia states, “In FonteChevade Man we have the EVIDENCE THAT HOMO SAPIENS (MODERN MAN) ACTUALLY PRECEDED NEANDERTHAL MAN IN ORDER OF APPEARANCE.” 37

SO HERE THE EVOLUTIONISTS HAVE TO ADMIT THAT “HOMO SAPIENS,” normal modern-type human beings, WERE RUNNING AROUND AT THE SAME TIME AS THE PITHECANTHROPINES (JAVA MAN) AND WERE HERE BEFORE THE NEANDERTHALS–BOTH OF WHOM WE’RE SUPPOSED TO HAVE EVOLVED FROM!–HA! Isn’t that just absolutely RIDICULOUS?! I mean, it takes more faith to believe evolution–it takes more faith to believe this incredible, fictitious, fairy tale of man’s origins than it does to accept God’s simple, beautiful, inspired explanation in His Word!

Advertisements

About bruceleeeowe
An engineering student and independent researcher. I'm researching and studying quantum physics(field theories). Also searching for alien life.

2 Responses to Evolution VS Creation:Part-I

  1. Gareth says:

    And Christians said dinosaurs weren’t real, until they saw the bones… Then they said they were on the ark too. Yeah no, There was a boat that all the animals in the world fit onto, but evolution is insane. But i guess for some its easier to read on simple tale than alot of complex factual accounts. Please read more books.

  2. Alberto Mario Striedinger Pinilla says:

    Both are theories, or religions if you want to put it that way… However, science looks for things, and facts, and evidence, rather it seems you only accept what is being written in the bible as unique truth. Do you know what science is? Science is DOUBT, science is curiosity, science is schematic reasoning, and schematic investigation, the accounting of facts to later analyze them, and even doubt them, or corroborate them with facts… indeed hypothesis arise, but if they are wrong,,, so what, you evaluate them again and keep looking. Nevertheless, to us humans is easier to accept unique truths than to live without know, so we pretend we know, we just think we know,… hence religion and science both get infected by this, little aspect which seems a fact………

    I dare to say that even though you point out some facts, you are biased.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: