Is There Methane Based Life Lurking In Titan?

Something is there which is consuming acetylene and Hydrogen on Saturn’s moon Titan. I could say for sure that methane based life forms are more probable answer to this anomaly. It’s been a while when I suggested that life on Saturn’s moon could be more probable based on a research paper which showed that life was lurking in lake of asphalt similar to lakes on Titan to some extent.

Now new data sent by Cassini showed the consumption of Hydrogen and Acetylene which is possibly the sign of  methane based life.

Two new papers based on data from NASA’s Cassini spacecraft scrutinize the complex chemical activity on the surface of Saturn’s moon Titan. While non-biological chemistry offers one possible explanation, some scientists believe these chemical signatures bolster the argument for a primitive, exotic form of life or precursor to life on Titan’s surface. According to one theory put forth by astrobiologists, the signatures fulfill two important conditions necessary for a hypothesized ‘methane-based life.’

One key finding comes from a paper online now in the journal Icarus that shows hydrogen molecules flowing down through Titan’s atmosphere and disappearing at the surface. Another paper online now in the Journal of Geophysical Research maps hydrocarbons on the Titan surface and finds a lack of acetylene.

This lack of acetylene is important because that chemical would likely be the best energy source for a methane-based life on Titan, said Chris McKay, an astrobiologist at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, Calif., who proposed a set of conditions necessary for this kind of methane-based life on Titan in 2005. One interpretation of the acetylene data is that the hydrocarbon is being consumed as food. But McKay said the flow of hydrogen is even more critical because all of their proposed mechanisms involved the consumption of hydrogen.

“We suggested hydrogen consumption because it’s the obvious gas for life to consume on Titan, similar to the way we consume oxygen on Earth,” McKay said. “If these signs do turn out to be a sign of life, it would be doubly exciting because it would represent a second form of life independent from water-based life on Earth.”

[Image Credit: NASA]

To date, methane-based life forms are only hypothetical. Scientists have not yet detected this form of life anywhere, though there are liquid-water-based microbes on Earth that thrive on methane or produce it as a waste product. On Titan, where temperatures are around 90 Kelvin (minus 290 degrees Fahrenheit), a methane-based organism would have to use a substance that is liquid as its medium for living processes, but not water itself. Water is frozen solid on Titan’s surface and much too cold to support life as we know it.

The list of liquid candidates is very short: liquid methane and related molecules like ethane. While liquid water is widely regarded as necessary for life, there has been extensive speculation published in the scientific literature that this is not a strict requirement.

The new hydrogen findings are consistent with conditions that could produce an exotic, methane-based life form, but do not definitively prove its existence, said Darrell Strobel, a Cassini interdisciplinary scientist based at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Md., who authored the paper on hydrogen.

Strobel, who studies the upper atmospheres of Saturn and Titan, analyzed data from Cassini’s composite infrared spectrometer and ion and neutral mass spectrometer in his new paper. The paper describes densities of hydrogen in different parts of the atmosphere and the surface. Previous models had predicted that hydrogen molecules, a byproduct of ultraviolet sunlight breaking apart acetylene and methane molecules in the upper atmosphere, should be distributed fairly evenly throughout the atmospheric layers.

Strobel found a disparity in the hydrogen densities that lead to a flow down to the surface at a rate of about 10,000 trillion trillion hydrogen molecules per second. This is about the same rate at which the molecules escape out of the upper atmosphere.

“It’s as if you have a hose and you’re squirting hydrogen onto the ground, but it’s disappearing,” Strobel said. “I didn’t expect this result, because molecular hydrogen is extremely chemically inert in the atmosphere, very light and buoyant. It should ‘float’ to the top of the atmosphere and escape.”

Strobel said it is not likely that hydrogen is being stored in a cave or underground space on Titan. The Titan surface is also so cold that a chemical process that involved a catalyst would be needed to convert hydrogen molecules and acetylene back to methane, even though overall there would be a net release of energy. The energy barrier could be overcome if there were an unknown mineral acting as the catalyst on Titan’s surface.

The hydrocarbon mapping research, led by Roger Clark, a Cassini team scientist based at the U.S. Geological Survey in Denver, examines data from Cassini’s visual and infrared mapping spectrometer. Scientists had expected the sun’s interactions with chemicals in the atmosphere to produce acetylene that falls down to coat the Titan surface. But Cassini detected no acetylene on the surface.

In addition Cassini’s spectrometer detected an absence of water ice on the Titan surface, but loads of benzene and another material, which appears to be an organic compound that scientists have not yet been able to identify. The findings lead scientists to believe that the organic compounds are shellacking over the water ice that makes up Titan’s bedrock with a film of hydrocarbons at least a few millimeters to centimeters thick, but possibly much deeper in some places. The ice remains covered up even as liquid methane and ethane flow all over Titan’s surface and fill up lakes and seas much as liquid water does on Earth.

“Titan’s atmospheric chemistry is cranking out organic compounds that rain down on the surface so fast that even as streams of liquid methane and ethane at the surface wash the organics off, the ice gets quickly covered again,” Clark said. “All that implies Titan is a dynamic place where organic chemistry is happening now.”

The absence of detectable acetylene on the Titan surface can very well have a non-biological explanation, said Mark Allen, principal investigator with the NASA Astrobiology Institute Titan team. Allen is based at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif. Allen said one possibility is that sunlight or cosmic rays are transforming the acetylene in icy aerosols in the atmosphere into more complex molecules that would fall to the ground with no acetylene signature.

“Scientific conservatism suggests that a biological explanation should be the last choice after all non-biological explanations are addressed,” Allen said. “We have a lot of work to do to rule out possible non-biological explanations. It is more likely that a chemical process, without biology, can explain these results – for example, reactions involving mineral catalysts.”

“These new results are surprising and exciting,” said Linda Spilker, Cassini project scientist at JPL. “Cassini has many more flybys of Titan that might help us sort out just what is happening at the surface.”

Now I hope we will discover exotic life on other planets and moons.


About bruceleeeowe
An engineering student and independent researcher. I'm researching and studying quantum physics(field theories). Also searching for alien life.

8 Responses to Is There Methane Based Life Lurking In Titan?

  1. unitedcats says:

    I’m more and more convinced that planets and moons are the “deep sea vents” of the Universe, and we’re gonna find exotic biospheres on pretty much all of them that have active chemical processes going on. Life is far hardier and more adaptable than most people ever imagined, extremophiles on Earth found in recent decades illustrate that quite nicely. And just that we call the “extremophiles” indicates we are still stuck in the limited perception that Earth life is “normal.” For all we know, Earth life is the extremophile in the Universe. Good post.

  2. bruceleeeowe says:

    I’m pretty much agree with you. I think our search programs are going in a wrong way. We should send surface probe in search of life not just only orbiter probes. These will be proven better, I bet. I wonder why NASA is not giving even a single try to such missions.

  3. Collins says:

    Density of atmosphere on Titan is low. This may be the reason for why NASA hasn’t sent even single surface mission.

    • Atmospheric pressure at the surface is actually closer to that of Earth than is the case with any other moon or planet in the solar system. About 1.4 times Earth pressure. The other worlds of the solar system either have much thicker atmospheres (Venus, gas giants) or much thinner (Mars, other moons). In fact one probe has been landed on Titan — the Huygens probe — but it wasn’t designed to keep broadcasting for long on the surface, more to get data about the atmosphere as it came down, which it did. I think the reason it was designed that way was that the people who planned Cassini-Huygens weren’t sure what the surface of Titan was like. Some scientists expected much more surface hydrocarbon than was found — an ocean, rather than lots of disconnected lakes. Or perhaps a plain of sticky tar. In short, they had no idea what sort of lander would work. I’d agree with bruceleeeowe that surface probes are the logical next step. Still, I have to take my hat off to the people (American and European) behind the Cassini-Huygens mission — whatever the ultimate conclusions, what it has found is historic.

  4. bruceleeeowe says:

    Density is not low that much. If you have watched alien planet in Discovery channel, then perhaps it were be easy to perceive what I’m talking about. Hydrogen could be used to propell it upwards in same way as used in early Zaplin. I think it need a whole peer reviewed article. Try to make it available to this weekend.

  5. Pingback: Gaza Nightmares, Undocumented Cats, Arizona Torpedoes Itself, Life Discovered on Titan, and Other News of the Week « Doug’s Darkworld

  6. Pingback: Could There Be Billion Year Old Entities? « WeirdSciences

  7. Pingback: Why Life On Titan Is Even More Probable? « WeirdSciences

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: