Poor Hawking You Are Still Wrong!!

Hawking is getting more and more weirder. This time a genius weirdo is explaining the origin of universe alone with his physical laws. In his latest book, The Grand Design, an extract of which is published in Eureka magazine in The Times, Hawking said: “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.” He added: “It is not necessary to invoke God to light the blue touch paper and set the Universe going.”

Okay, admitted! Admitted that Hawking is right then he need to explain everything around us as to why it exist at all? Hawking has already made a fuss of controversial statements.

This is the big bang which started from a explosion and symmetry breaking in ultimate supersymmetric singularity. It seems fairly likely that there was a Big Bang. The obvious question that could be asked to challenge or define the boundaries between physics and metaphysics is: what came before the Big Bang? Physicists define the boundaries of physics by trying to describe them theoretically and then testing that description against observation. Our observed expanding Universe is very well described by flat space, with critical density supplied mainly by dark matter and a cosmological constant, that should expand forever. If we follow this model backwards in time to when the Universe was very hot and dense, and dominated by radiation, then we have to understand the particle physics that happens at such high densities of energy. The experimental understanding of particle physics starts to poop out after the energy scale of electroweak unification, and theoretical physicists have to reach for models of particle physics beyond the Standard Model, to Grand Unified Theories, supersymmetry, string theory and quantum cosmology.

Theories can explain the characteristics but not ultimate fundamental origin. Even if we would have discovered the grand unified theory or say theory of everything, a fundamental question would still be unexplained for us perplexing our 1600cc mind for infinite light years in time dimension that is, from where such singularity came? Who created the space time itself? What is that upholding the whole quantum chunk of space time? Indeed, what is withing our scope that we could know how this universe was formed, what are the laws of universe, how to create extra dimensions of our own or even universe.!?

Consider a scenario to comprehend the controversial case with better intellect! What if we have created five dimensional universe of our own followed by programming laws of universe and intensionally creating a ultimate singularity made of compactified 10^78 electrons,protons and neutrons? Assume somehow we have completed this task by hook or crook. Since we already have TOE( Theory of Everything) so it is desired that we would explode it using our technology inasmuch it would be stupidity to wait for billions of years to see a big bang explosion happening(or we may accelerate the rate of change of time by vast amounts). Now consider the evolution of universe in a same way(it would be slightly different since this time we are dealing with a five dimensional universe not classical 4dimensional universe) as it has already happened. It is presumed that there are intelligent beings which have been evolved along the pace of time. Now if these five dimensional intelligent intellectual entities are smart enough to comprehend their five dimensional universe. Now consider they have discovered quantum theory of origin of universe and physical laws of extradimensions and parallel universes.
What if another five dimensional Hawking( this is not four dimensional Hawking) has acclaimed that we don’t need god since we could explain the origin of our five dimensional universe with the help of supergravity? Is he correct? Certainly not!!

Something can be explained without the need of anything doesn’t mean that anything don’t exist. This is where Hawking still stands for totally vague and satired leaning argument. Hey Hawking, stop this unnecessery controversies!!

Advertisements

About bruceleeeowe
An engineering student and independent researcher. I'm researching and studying quantum physics(field theories). Also searching for alien life.

9 Responses to Poor Hawking You Are Still Wrong!!

  1. Morien says:

    Professor Hawking’s statement is abhorrent for me. He should shut down his old tired mind.

  2. Tim says:

    Hawking is no more incorrect. Imagine if you have theory of everything then why we need god at all. You have considered that specific scenario to prove him wrong. Not fair!!

  3. bruceleeeowe says:

    Hi Tim,
    Hawking is incorrect and he is purporting totally vague arguments. My example much clarifies the case. I wonder how certain are you about that. I’ve just expressed the possibility of being such a case existent.

  4. This isn’t exactly a science thing, it’s a theological thing, and the recurrent question of whether God exists or not is always compromised by the fact that, apparently, Man needs God a lot more than God needs man. Even the atheists, who try to write a new ten commandments to live by, tend to end up creating a new theology that reflects the prescence of God in our lives. Another recurrent theme in brain and psychological research articles is that we may be hardwired to believe in an unseen significant other that lends meaning and sense or logic to the world and everything else. It might be tied up with our consciences as well, because like your conscience, God always knows what you do! If we encountered Human-like aliens on another planet someday, odds are that parallel evolution will have given them religion and a belief in a supreme being as well, and this same perpetual question of the existence of God as well.

  5. Morien says:

    That explains why is he stupid!!

  6. bruceleeeowe says:

    I’ve not reflected my thoughts in the sense of theology. Delving into anything that is unknown with certain logics and try to fit them with what is observable/theoretical possible/plausible , is exactly science. This is not belief which make it existent, this is his existence which is somehow programmed or tied up into our brains might be intentionally, I don’t know.

  7. icetrout says:

    Hurry somebody plug him back in he’s just about brain-dead 😛

  8. terryb says:

    So I’m faced with a choice between a student (bruceleeeowe), Morlen (apparently a believer in fairy stories garnered from ancient texts of dubious origin touted as ‘facts’), icetrout (an insensitive excuse for a human with little of worth to add) or Professor Stephen Hawking who has proven his remarkable mind and scientific credentials over and over again.

    I may not fully understand everything he says but the quality of the content of this article and the responses tell me who to listen to.

    • bruceleeeowe says:

      Hi terry,
      certainly this is not to mean that there is a superbeing who created this universe in 6 days rather it explains there should be a ‘fundamental cause’ which inargurated the big bang. There must have been something that had put it at first place.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: